Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1994-04-29 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1994-04-29 House Journal Page 3872 SB 349 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 349(JUD) "An Act amending Alaska Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(r) relating to admissibility of hearsay evidence by peace officers before the grand jury." with the: Journal Page JUDICIARY REFERRAL WAIVED 3686 STA RPT 4DP 3NR 3823 -4 PREV SEN ZERO FNS (2-ADM,LAW,DPS)3/9 3823 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Ulmer: Page 2, line 25, after "is": Delete "a" Insert "the supervising or lead peace officer on the investigating team." Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Porter objected. Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1994-04-29 House Journal Page 3873 SB 349 New Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Ulmer, Brice, Mackie and Porter: Page 2, line 26, after "officer": Insert "involved in the investigation" Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that New Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 2 was not offered. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Ulmer: Page 2, line 29: Delete "." Insert "; and" Page 2, following line 29: Insert "(iii) additional evidence is introduced to corroborate the statement." Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Porter objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 349(JUD) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 20 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 1994-04-29 House Journal Page 3874 SB 349 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Grussendorf, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Moses, Nicholia, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Martin, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Hoffman, Navarre Sanders changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 3 was adopted. Amendment Nos. 4 and 5 were not offered. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 349(JUD) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSB 349(JUD) am H was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSSB 349(JUD) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 349(JUD) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 1994-04-29 House Journal Page 3875 SB 349 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Sitton Excused: Hoffman, Navarre And so, CSSB 349(JUD) am H passed the House. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Porter gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSSB 349(JUD) am H.